<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3Delight &amp; rendering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.machinefilm.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768</link>
	<description>the development blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:41:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ady</title>
		<link>http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768&#038;cpage=1#comment-9290</link>
		<dc:creator>ady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768#comment-9290</guid>
		<description>Awesome stuff. I am inspired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome stuff. I am inspired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas kusumahadi</title>
		<link>http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768&#038;cpage=1#comment-7697</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas kusumahadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768#comment-7697</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Amazing stuff you&#039;ve done.
I really interested to do such thing with 3delight.

But somehow the dof is too heavy to my eyes. 
With that field of view, even a fast lens (large aperture), say f/2.8, can&#039;t give that narrow dof, unless the focus point is so close to the camera.  

But the works is nothing sort of impressive.
Want to learn to do that.

Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Amazing stuff you&#8217;ve done.<br />
I really interested to do such thing with 3delight.</p>
<p>But somehow the dof is too heavy to my eyes.<br />
With that field of view, even a fast lens (large aperture), say f/2.8, can&#8217;t give that narrow dof, unless the focus point is so close to the camera.  </p>
<p>But the works is nothing sort of impressive.<br />
Want to learn to do that.</p>
<p>Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abbey</title>
		<link>http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768&#038;cpage=1#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768#comment-233</guid>
		<description>I love these posts! The film looks brilliant and I can&#039;t wait to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these posts! The film looks brilliant and I can&#8217;t wait to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidmaas</title>
		<link>http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768&#038;cpage=1#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>davidmaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.machinefilm.com/?p=768#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Fatnstic stuff!

Please keep posting. Particularly about your results with linear color adjustments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fatnstic stuff!</p>
<p>Please keep posting. Particularly about your results with linear color adjustments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
